Governance, risk and compliance that runs continuously — and proves it.
Resilience Fabric maps your obligations, connects to the tools you already run, and keeps every control under continuous assurance — audit-ready evidence, every day, with AI doing the tedious work so your team keeps the business calls.
AI proposes. A named person decides.
Every decision that carries accountability is approved by an identified person, on the record — never the AI alone.
Private AI inference, inside the EEA
Our models run on TruSecure-operated infrastructure in EU datacentres, not a public AI service — and no Customer Content is transferred to the US or Asia.
Continuous, not audit-time
Evidence is collected every day and stays on file. Audits read the record instead of racing to create one.
Every framework you answer to — plus one we wrote
One control model maps the full regulatory landscape — and TruSecure authored OpenAISF, an open AI-safety framework, in-house.
Compliance was a project. Regulation made it an operation.
NIS2, DORA, the EU AI Act — and the regimes stacking up behind them — don't ask for a report. They demand continuous evidence, personal accountability for management, and incident reporting measured in hours.
Deliver documents that age the day they're signed.
Deliver databases your team has to feed.
Neither runs the operation.
Neither output is security. → TS-02 · Mechanism
The regulatory surface has widened faster than either category can follow — and the next regime is always in draft.
Landed with a different transposition in every member state — one directive, twenty-seven legal readings.
Brought operational resilience testing into scope for financial entities.
27001:2022 reworked the control set; 42001 introduced a management standard for AI.
Obligations most compliance tools have no model for at all.
More regulation met the only response the old tools allowed: more process.
- Regulatory pace has outstripped operational capacity — new regimes hit simultaneously, and the default response is more committees, not instrumented systems.
- Compliance and security live in different systems than the ones they're meant to govern, so "proving" a control means manual screenshots and ticket exports.
- AI governance is new and unowned — most organizations default to policy binders instead of embedding controls into the AI pipeline itself.
- Overlapping frameworks each demand their own evidence trail for what is often the same underlying control, multiplying paperwork, not risk reduction.
That response is bureaucracy, and bureaucracy is not governance.
One platform. One stack. One point of contact.
Audit-ready every day, not once a year.
Audit season means chasing screenshots across a dozen systems — and re-mapping the same control for every framework you answer to.
Fabric crosswalks your controls once — across every framework you answer to — then collects evidence continuously from the tools you already run. Every action logged, every claim inspectable.
Subscription, scoped to your situation — talk to us.
One accountable expert for your whole stack.
Your security stack is a dozen tools from a dozen vendors. When an integration breaks, every vendor points at another — and you hold the pieces.
We build premium connectors for the tools we know deeply — and where you need the tool itself, we supply it. The tool, the connector and the platform come from one partner who is expert in all three.
One contract, one number to call, the best package price — nothing resold through a chain of middlemen. Marketplace and free community connectors cover everything else.
Browse integrations →A running operating model in weeks — not a binder in twelve months.
Fixed scope. AI does the tedious 80% of the work; your team keeps the 20% that matters. Fabric keeps it running afterward — nothing ends up on a shelf.
Book a SprintCommunity Edition — our open-source core, currently being ported. Free forever. Get notified →
Don't take our word for it. Inspect it.
Every claim opens like this
Click any statement in the dashboard and it opens to the proof behind it — in plain business terms:
- What it covers
- who has access to what
- Proof comes from
- your existing identity tool, connected read-only
- How fresh
- collected continuously — not at audit time
- Approved by
- a named person, on the record
- Tamper-evident
- sealed with an integrity hash
You do the work once
One control — say, "review who has access to what" — satisfies every rulebook that asks for it, because they all ask for the same thing in different words. TruSecure maps it once; you maintain one control, not one per regime.
One control, every rulebook answered:
- NIS2— answered by the same evidence
- ISO 27001— answered by the same evidence
- DORA— answered by the same evidence
- SOC 2— answered by the same evidence
- EU AI Act— answered by the same evidence
- GDPR— answered by the same evidence
- ⋯ and every other framework that touches it
Nothing changes without a person
The AI prepares the work. A named person makes every decision that carries accountability — and the record proves it:
- The AI proposesa mapping, a gap, a draft — with its sources attached
- A named person decidesapproves, rejects or amends — with identity and timestamp
- The record is sealednothing can change afterward without leaving a mark
Proof by artifacts and authorship — not logos.
Every framework you answer to — and one of our own.
Resilience Fabric maps the full landscape — NIS2, DORA, GDPR, the EU AI Act, the ISO family, NIST, SOC 2, CMMC, CIS Controls, and whatever regulators write next — into one set of operating controls. And we didn't stop at supporting other people's standards: OpenAISF is the framework TruSecure wrote. It covers every requirement of ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act — and requires 118 controls across 20 domains, 36 of them originals no incumbent framework has: agent authority, detection, incident containment, identity delegation, AI data governance, and the integrity of conformance evidence itself. Conformance expires on its own, so it can't be claimed once and shelved.
Free and open — the specification under CC BY 4.0, the tooling under Apache 2.0 — developed in-house at TruSecure, and the same thinking that shapes the platform.
Read the framework at openaisf.org →- Covers
- every requirement of ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act
- Requires
- 118 controls across 20 domains
- Originals
- 36 controls no incumbent framework has
- Focus
- agent authority · detection · containment · identity delegation · data governance · evidence integrity
- Conformance
- expires on its own
- Built
- in-house at TruSecure
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0 spec · Apache 2.0 tooling
Sovereignty you can inspect, layer by layer.
Where your data sits matters less than whose legal reach extends to whoever holds it. We separate that into four layers, claim three of them, and tell you which one we do not.
Romanian and UK entities. One EU sub-processor. No US- or Asia-based party anywhere in the processing chain.
TruSecure operates its own inference on hardware it runs inside OVH's French and German datacentres, by default. Because open-weight models run on that hardware rather than behind someone else's API, an inference request reaches no external model provider by default — and any fallback runs only on infrastructure the customer has approved in writing, recorded in their own tenant settings.
Full machine-readable export of your Customer Content at any time, and an open core you will be able to run yourself once Community Edition is released.
GPUs are NVIDIA — designed in the United States, fabricated in Asia. Practically every serious AI workload in Europe runs on the same silicon. We do not claim silicon sovereignty, and we would rather say so than let you find out later.
This page fetched nothing from anyone else. No CDN, no third-party web fonts, no analytics, no tag manager. Open your developer tools and check — we would rather you verified it than believed us.
AI proposes. A named person decides.
Our AI never autonomously approves a risk acceptance, marks a control compliant, or submits a regulatory report — and it runs on our own private inference infrastructure, not a public AI service. Both statements are published, not asserted.
- The AI may
- read, classify, map, summarize, draft and propose
- The AI never
- approves a risk acceptance, marks a control compliant, or submits a regulatory report
- Where it runs
- TruSecure-operated private inference — by default, for every customer
Built for the seats that carry the accountability.
Three steps. No open-ended commitment.
Every step is small, fixed and reversible. You see the platform on your own situation before you commit to anything beyond a conversation.
- Book a demo
We scope your regulatory mix and show Resilience Fabric against it — your frameworks, your stack, your evidence sources.
- Start with a Sprint or pilot
Fixed scope, fixed weeks. Your Cyber Resilience Operating Model stands up fast, reviewed by our practitioners.
- Fabric runs continuously
Connectors feed evidence from your existing tools; AI keeps the tedious work off your team's desk.
Frequently asked questions
What is TruSecure?
What is Cyber Governance Operations?
What does TruSecure cost?
Is TruSecure only useful for NIS2?
Is the open-source Community Edition available now?
How is AI used, and is it safe for sensitive governance data?
Does TruSecure replace legal advice or a certification audit?
Talk to us.
One conversation establishes your scope, your stack and the fastest route to audit-ready.