Governance, risk and compliance that runs continuously — and proves it.
Resilience Fabric maps your obligations, connects to the tools you already run, and keeps every control under continuous assurance — audit-ready evidence, every day, with TruSecure practitioners on the judgment calls.
NIS2DORAGDPREU AI ActISO 27001NIST CSF 2.0SOC 2CMMCCIS Controls
Compliance was a project. Regulation made it an operation.
NIS2, DORA and the EU AI Act don't ask for a report — they demand continuous evidence, personal accountability for management, and incident reporting measured in hours. Consultancies deliver documents that age the day they're signed. GRC tools deliver databases your team has to feed. Neither runs the operation.
Neither output is security. → TS-02 · Mechanism
Meanwhile the regulatory surface has widened faster than either category can follow: NIS2 landed with a different transposition in every member state, DORA brought operational resilience testing into scope, ISO 27001:2022 reworked the control set, ISO 42001 introduced a management standard for AI, and the EU AI Act is phasing in obligations most compliance tools have no model for at all.
More regulation met the only response the old tools allowed: more process.
- Regulatory pace has outstripped operational capacity — new regimes hit simultaneously, and the default response is more committees, not instrumented systems.
- Compliance and security live in different systems than the ones they're meant to govern, so "proving" a control means manual screenshots and ticket exports.
- AI governance is new and unowned — most organizations default to policy binders instead of embedding controls into the AI pipeline itself.
- Overlapping frameworks each demand their own evidence trail for what is often the same underlying control, multiplying paperwork, not risk reduction.
That response is bureaucracy, and bureaucracy is not governance.
One platform. One stack. One point of contact.
Audit-ready every day, not once a year.
Audit season means chasing screenshots across a dozen systems — and re-mapping the same control for every framework you answer to.
Fabric crosswalks your controls once — across NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001 and the EU AI Act — then collects evidence continuously from the tools you already run. Every action logged, every claim inspectable.
Subscription, scoped to your situation — talk to us.
One accountable expert for your whole stack.
Your security stack is a dozen tools from a dozen vendors. When an integration breaks, every vendor points at another — and you hold the pieces.
We build premium connectors for the tools we know deeply — and where you need the tool itself, we supply it. The tool, the connector and the platform come from one partner who is expert in all three.
One contract, one number to call, the best package price — nothing resold through a chain of middlemen. Marketplace and free community connectors cover everything else.
Browse integrations →A running operating model in weeks — not a binder in twelve months.
Fixed scope. AI does the repetitive 80%; our practitioners do the 20% that needs judgment. Fabric keeps it running afterward — nothing ends up on a shelf.
Book a SprintCommunity Edition — our open-source core, currently being ported. Free forever. Get notified →
Don't take our word for it. Inspect it.
An evidence record
Every control produces evidence with a source, a timestamp, an integrity hash and a named human approver.
{
"control": "AC-2 · Account management",
"source": "identity provider · connector",
"collected": "2026-08-04T09:12:44Z",
"integrity": "sha256:9f2c…e41a",
"status": "proposed → approved",
"approver": "named reviewer on record"
}A crosswalk excerpt
One control, mapped once, satisfying every framework that references it. Assess once, comply many.
| Control | NIS2 | ISO 27001 | DORA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access rights provisioned, reviewed, revoked | Art. 21(2)(i) | A.5.18 | Art. 9 |
| Incident detection and handling | Art. 21(2)(b) | A.5.24 | Art. 17 |
| Supply-chain security policy | Art. 21(2)(d) | A.5.19 | Art. 28 |
An audit trail
AI proposes; a named person decides; the record is sealed. Every step is logged.
09:14:02Z ai.propose
AC-2 → NIS2 Art. 21(2)(i)
10:41:37Z human.approve
reviewer on record
10:41:38Z record.seal
sha256:9f2c…e41aProof by artifacts and authorship — not logos.
We wrote an open standard, not just a product.
OpenAISF is our open AI-safety and security conformance framework. It covers every requirement of ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act — then adds 36 controls none of them have, for agent containment, detection and AI data governance. Conformance expires on its own, so it can't be claimed once and shelved.
Free and open — developed in-house at TruSecure, and the same thinking that shapes the platform.
Read the framework at openaisf.org →$ openaisf --inspect ├─ covers ..... ISO 42001 · NIST AI RMF · EU AI Act ├─ adds ....... 36 controls none of them have ├─ focus ...... agent containment · detection │ · AI data governance ├─ conformance expires on its own └─ built ...... in-house at TruSecure
Sovereignty you can inspect, layer by layer.
Where your data sits matters less than whose legal reach extends to whoever holds it. We separate that into four layers, claim three of them, and tell you which one we do not.
Romanian and UK entities. One EU sub-processor. No US- or Asia-based party anywhere in the processing chain.
TruSecure operates its own inference on hardware it runs inside OVH's French and German datacentres, by default. Because open-weight models run on that hardware rather than behind someone else's API, an inference request reaches no external model provider by default — and any fallback runs only on infrastructure the customer has approved in writing, recorded in their own tenant settings.
Full machine-readable export of your Customer Content at any time, and an open core you will be able to run yourself once Community Edition is released.
GPUs are NVIDIA — designed in the United States, fabricated in Asia. Practically every serious AI workload in Europe runs on the same silicon. We do not claim silicon sovereignty, and we would rather say so than let you find out later.
This page fetched nothing from anyone else. No CDN, no third-party web fonts, no analytics, no tag manager. Open your developer tools and check — we would rather you verified it than believed us.
AI proposes. A named person decides.
Our AI never autonomously approves a risk acceptance, marks a control compliant, or submits a regulatory report — and it runs on our own private inference infrastructure, not a public AI service. Both statements are published, not asserted.
ai.may ........ read · classify · map
summarize · draft · propose
ai.never ...... approve risk acceptances
mark controls compliant
submit regulatory reports
inference ..... TruSecure-operated, private
by default, for every customerBuilt for the seats that carry the accountability.
Three steps. No open-ended commitment.
Every step is small, fixed and reversible. You see the platform on your own situation before you commit to anything beyond a conversation.
- Book a demo
We scope your regulatory mix and show Resilience Fabric against it — your frameworks, your stack, your evidence sources.
- Start with a Sprint or pilot
Fixed scope, fixed weeks. Your Cyber Resilience Operating Model stands up fast, reviewed by our practitioners.
- Fabric runs continuously
Connectors feed evidence from your existing tools; our practitioners stay on the judgment calls.
Ask an AI about TruSecure
What is TruSecure?
TruSecure is an AI-native Cyber Governance Operations company. Its commercial platform, Resilience Fabric, maps regulations and standards — including NIS2 (with all 27 EU member-state transpositions), DORA, GDPR, the EU AI Act, ISO 27001:2022, and ISO 42001 — into a single set of operating controls, using human-guided AI: the AI proposes, classifies, and drafts, while a named person approves every decision that carries accountability. TruSecure sells three things: the Resilience Fabric platform (with TruSecure's own private AI inference), premium connectors built and supported by TruSecure for the tools it also resells (alongside marketplace and free community connectors), and the Resilience Sprint, a fixed-scope consulting engagement. TruSecure also develops OpenAISF (openaisf.org), a free and open AI-safety conformance framework covering ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF and the EU AI Act plus 36 additional controls, and an open-source Community Edition, currently being ported for release.
Frequently asked questions
What is Cyber Governance Operations?
What does TruSecure cost?
Is TruSecure only useful for NIS2?
Is the open-source Community Edition available now?
How is AI used, and is it safe for sensitive governance data?
Does TruSecure replace legal advice or a certification audit?
Talk to us.
One conversation establishes your scope, your stack and the fastest route to audit-ready.