Board reporting, sourced from what's actually true right now.
The quarterly board pack is usually a week of someone copying numbers out of systems into slides — numbers that were already stale when they were copied. NIS2 Art. 20 makes management personally accountable for cybersecurity risk-management; accountable means being able to see it.
TruSecure rolls risk, control, incident and supplier data up automatically into board-ready views, sourced from live control state rather than assembled exports. Approvals and decisions are timestamped and attributable, forming the accountability record NIS2 Art. 20 and DORA both require.
How it works
- Roll up
Control state, open risks, incidents and supplier posture aggregate continuously from the shared control model — no export week, no stale snapshots.
- Compose
Board-legible views answer the questions a board actually asks: what is our exposure, what changed this quarter, what needs a decision.
- Decide on the record
When the board approves a direction or accepts a risk, the decision is captured with identity and timestamp — the accountability artefact, produced as a by-product of governing.
- Drill to source
Every figure in the pack traces back to the controls and evidence behind it. A board member’s "how do we know that?" has a one-click answer.
What the pack is built from
| Section | Sourced from | Answers |
|---|---|---|
| Control posture | Control library state, continuously evidenced | ISO 27001 · SoA |
| Risk movement | Live risk register, incl. expiring exceptions | NIS2 Art. 20 |
| Incident quarter | Incident workflow records and report stages | NIS2 Art. 23 |
| Training completion | Security-awareness connector records | NIS2 Art. 20(2) |
| Supplier posture | Continuous supplier risk register | DORA Art. 28 |
Because the pack reads from the same model the auditor reads, the number the board sees and the evidence the auditor samples can never quietly be two different truths.