Skip to main content
PLATFORM · BUSINESS CONTINUITY

Continuity that is proven, not filed.

Most continuity plans are written for an audit and then left untouched until the next one. The backup regime behind them is assumed, not verified. And the crisis exercise that was supposed to happen in March quietly became next year’s problem.

NIS2 expects business continuity — backup management, disaster recovery and crisis management — as an operating measure, and DORA expects tested response and recovery plans. TruSecure governs continuity as living controls: plans owned and reviewed on a cycle, backup verification read from the systems that actually run it, exercises logged with their outcomes.

How it works

  1. Register

    Each continuity element — the plan, the backup regime, each recovery procedure, the crisis protocol — becomes a control with a named owner and a review cycle.

  2. Connect

    Backup and infrastructure connectors confirm the technical reality: last successful restore test, replication state, whether the RPO on paper matches the RPO in production.

  3. Exercise

    Tests and crisis exercises are logged with outcomes and lessons learned. The next exercise date is tracked by the platform, not remembered by a person.

  4. Improve

    Findings feed back into the control model as tracked remediations. The gap an exercise exposed stays visible until it closes — it does not evaporate with the meeting notes.

What a continuity control looks like

Continuity control · core services backupSample data
Last restore test
OK · 2 days ago
RPO target
4 h · met
Plan review
current · owner named
Last exercise
tabletop · 2026-05-14
Citations
NIS2 21(2)(c) · DORA Art. 11

Which regulations it maps to

Continuity obligations · by framework
FrameworkWhat it expectsCitation
NIS2Backup management, disaster recovery and crisis managementArt. 21(2)(c)
DORAResponse and recovery plans, maintained and testedArt. 11
ISO 27001Security during disruption; ICT readiness for continuityA.5.29 + A.5.30

The backup and cloud connectors read restore-test results and replication state straight from the platforms that run them — no separate continuity register to keep alive by hand.

When continuity is governed this way, the audit question “when did you last test this?” has a timestamped answer, and the board question “are we actually recoverable?” has an honest one. Both come from the same model as every other control answer.

The monitoring loop

continuous · every 6 hours
  1. 01

    Connect

    Read-only connectors into AWS, Azure, GCP, on-premise.

    AWSAzureGCPon-prem
  2. 02

    Collect

    AI pulls compliance evidence every 6 hours — not at audit time.

    every 6 h
  3. 03

    Detect

    Gaps and control drift flagged the moment they appear.

    24/7
  4. 04

    Remediate

    Routine fixes closed automatically; the rest routed to you.

    auto
  5. 05

    Approve

    A named person decides. The approval is the record.

    logged
90% less manual evidence work100% audit-ready, every day

The 80/20 advantage. AI handles the tedium — evidence, testing, gap analysis, routine fixes. Your team keeps the interesting 20%: strategic decisions, policy exceptions, risk acceptance.